🔗 Share this article

The count of guaranteed seats for Māori representatives on New Zealand councils is set to be cut by more than half, after a controversial law change that required local governments to submit the future of hard-won Indigenous wards to a public vote.

Historical Context on Indigenous Representation

Indigenous electoral districts, which may have one or more elected officials depending on local population numbers, were established in 2001 to provide Māori electors the option to vote for a assured Indigenous council member in municipal and provincial governments. Initially, local governments could only create a Māori ward by initially submitting it to a public vote in their area. Local populations frequently spent years building local support and pushing their local governments to establish Māori wards.

Legislative Shifts and Government Actions

To remedy the issue, the previous Labour government allowed local councils to set up a Indigenous seat without initially mandating them to subject it to a public vote.

However, this year, the current administration overturned the policy, stating local residents should decide whether to establish Māori wards.

Referendum Results

The new legislation required local authorities that had created a electoral district under the previous policy to conduct decisive public votes concurrently with the local body elections, which ended on 11 October. Out of 42 local governments taking part in the referendum, 17 voted to retain their wards, and 25 to disestablish theirs – showing many regions opposed to guaranteed Māori representation.

These outcomes provided “a crucial move in restoring community self-determination.”

Opposition parties however have condemned the new policy as “discriminatory” and “anti-Māori”. After assuming power, the coalition government has implemented extensive reversals to measures intended to enhance Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. The government has stated it aims to terminate “race-based” policies, and asserts it is dedicated to enhancing results for Indigenous people and all New Zealanders.

Urban-Rural Divide

Outcomes of the referendums were split down urban-rural lines – most urban centers mandated to hold referendums supported Indigenous seats, while rural regions leaned strongly towards removing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Māori wards that had recently been established – they’re just beginning to find their footing.”

Voter Turnout and Concerns

The recent local government elections recorded the smallest electoral participation in over three decades, with less than a third of citizens participating, prompting demands for reform.

The process had been “a farce”.

Comparative Treatment

Local governments are permitted to establish other types of wards – such as rural wards – without initially mandating a community ballot. The disparate requirements applied to Māori wards suggested the government was singling out Māori representation.

“Well, they failed. Numerous localities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This statement referred to the 17 areas that chose to keep their seats.